若在婚內被以故意手段懷孕？ - 法律

※ 引述《Swerhin (滾滾滾過來)》之銘言：
: 刑法上第一個想到的是強制性交，但又覺得不太一樣，因為性交的過程是合意，但懷
孕?

如果當初同意性交的基礎是建立在使用避孕裝置，
那麼之後用欺瞞的方式拿掉、破壞避孕裝置，或是讓避孕措施無效，
同意還可以說是有效的嗎？

: 結果不是。
: 還是只要性交內容上（避孕問題）有分歧就不能算是合意呢？
: 況且懷孕是否構成是一種身體上的侵害？個人認為應該是啦，不管墮不墮胎都會導致
女?

身體自主權、生育自主權，如果避孕措施是保險套，還有一部分是免於疾病感染

: 身體有些問題。


新加坡最近的刑法修正草案：

https://reurl.cc/5K8Xy

34. In addition, the Bill introduces a new offence criminalising the
procurement of sexual activity where consent is obtained by deception or
false representation regarding (a) the use or manner of use of a sexually
protective device, or (b) whether one is suffering from a sexually
transmitted disease. In such cases, while consent is not legally negated (as
the deception does not relate to the nature of the act, the purpose of the
act, or the identity of the person doing the act), the consent obtained is
compromised, and there is risk of physical harm to the victim.


英國之前的判決：

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-22281457
Sex consent could still lead to rape charge, judges say

R (on the application of F) v The Director of Public Prosecutions and “A”
[2013] EWHC 945
https://reurl.cc/9D1xa


瑞士：
Court Rules A Man Who Removed A Condom During Sex Is Guilty of Rape
https://reurl.cc/lzZl6


美國學者Alexandra Brodsky的期刊論文
“Rape-Adjacent”: Imagining Legal Responses To Nonconsensual Condom Removal


--