適用法律之平等 和 法律上的平等差異? - 法律
By Yuri
at 2015-08-14T14:17
at 2015-08-14T14:17
Table of Contents
最近開始自學憲法,
對下方這段摸不著頭緒,
Quote整段有疑問的句子:
普魯士憲法第四條規定:"所有普魯士人在法律之前一律平等",本條規定在當時
被解釋成"適用法律之平等",而非"法律上之平等",因為依據當時的盛行見解,
普魯士憲法第四條保障的既然是"法律之前"的平等,則立法者當然不受平等原則
之拘束,人民因此只享有"適用法律之平等"。
完全看不懂這段,可以麻煩了解的人解說一下嗎?
又想請問一下 "適用法律之平等" 和 "法律上的平等" 兩者差異在哪?
謝謝。
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Thomas
at 2015-08-16T04:18
at 2015-08-16T04:18
By Sandy
at 2015-08-19T03:43
at 2015-08-19T03:43
By Margaret
at 2015-08-21T15:44
at 2015-08-21T15:44
By Rebecca
at 2015-08-22T06:57
at 2015-08-22T06:57
By Quanna
at 2015-08-24T22:38
at 2015-08-24T22:38
By Heather
at 2015-08-28T23:01
at 2015-08-28T23:01
By Adele
at 2015-08-30T17:03
at 2015-08-30T17:03
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2015-09-04T01:40
at 2015-09-04T01:40
By Ida
at 2015-09-04T13:59
at 2015-09-04T13:59
By Candice
at 2015-09-09T01:08
at 2015-09-09T01:08
By Caroline
at 2015-09-10T09:43
at 2015-09-10T09:43
Related Posts
寵物龜問題糾紛
By Ursula
at 2015-08-14T09:29
at 2015-08-14T09:29
開砂石車,被倒債
By Robert
at 2015-08-13T21:18
at 2015-08-13T21:18
販賣商標貼紙 商標法侵權
By Heather
at 2015-08-13T20:03
at 2015-08-13T20:03
關於網路上誹謗的屬地主義?
By Blanche
at 2015-08-13T19:58
at 2015-08-13T19:58
這起車禍能用信賴原則嗎?
By Caitlin
at 2015-08-13T18:00
at 2015-08-13T18:00