不純正不作為犯的解題 - 法律
By Heather
at 2015-09-02T15:04
at 2015-09-02T15:04
Table of Contents
甲為保母照顧嬰兒乙
乙因父母未歸兩日被甲餓昏
(但甲的確有意圖餓死乙的證據)
所幸鄰居機伶報警救出餓昏的乙
問
(一)若乙真餓死,甲是否為結果犯中的狀態犯?
(二)依原情形,甲是否為不純正不作為犯又
此情形是否為行為犯而非結果犯
(三)由上述兩題是否可證明,不純正不作為犯
是否為行為犯或結果犯仍須端看結果之有無?
再次麻煩各位神人解釋一下 感謝!
--
乙因父母未歸兩日被甲餓昏
(但甲的確有意圖餓死乙的證據)
所幸鄰居機伶報警救出餓昏的乙
問
(一)若乙真餓死,甲是否為結果犯中的狀態犯?
(二)依原情形,甲是否為不純正不作為犯又
此情形是否為行為犯而非結果犯
(三)由上述兩題是否可證明,不純正不作為犯
是否為行為犯或結果犯仍須端看結果之有無?
再次麻煩各位神人解釋一下 感謝!
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Hedwig
at 2015-09-07T06:20
at 2015-09-07T06:20
By Vanessa
at 2015-09-11T10:50
at 2015-09-11T10:50
By Franklin
at 2015-09-12T15:07
at 2015-09-12T15:07
By Kelly
at 2015-09-16T09:32
at 2015-09-16T09:32
By Frederica
at 2015-09-20T21:25
at 2015-09-20T21:25
By Callum
at 2015-09-25T09:10
at 2015-09-25T09:10
By Oscar
at 2015-09-29T03:50
at 2015-09-29T03:50
By Kristin
at 2015-09-30T18:29
at 2015-09-30T18:29
Related Posts
非監護人動用受監護人的錢?
By Catherine
at 2015-09-02T06:51
at 2015-09-02T06:51
工作室產業登記類別
By Rebecca
at 2015-09-02T02:59
at 2015-09-02T02:59
侵犯配偶權
By Gary
at 2015-09-02T02:04
at 2015-09-02T02:04
工作室無限清償責任
By Oscar
at 2015-09-02T01:27
at 2015-09-02T01:27
頂樓居住問題
By Todd Johnson
at 2015-09-02T00:09
at 2015-09-02T00:09