同時履行抗辯 - 法律
By Tracy
at 2018-12-18T00:21
at 2018-12-18T00:21
Table of Contents
相關原文網址於此：
https://tinyurl.com/yayvur8m
最後一段提及
專利法第7條第1項所規定，雇用人應支付受雇人適當之報酬，並非係雇用人取得受雇人職
務上所完成之發明依契約所應為之對待給付，非屬因契約互負債務，被告自不得就原告應
給付之適當報酬與移轉系爭專利之義務，主張同時履行抗辯。
個人去查了專利法第7條第1項，其規定為：
受雇人於職務上所完成之發明、新型或設計，其專利申請權及專利權屬於
雇用人，雇用人應支付受雇人適當之報酬。但契約另有約定者，從其約定
問題來了
想問的是
既然專利法已經規定雇用人應支付受雇人適當之報酬
為何在法院的判決中卻又說非屬契約互負債務 不得主張同時履行抗辯?
專利法不已經明定雇用人與受雇人之間的關係了嗎?
受雇人的發明、新型、設計 ----> 雇用人
雇用人的報酬 ----> 受雇人
還是說 判決中所指的是 要有明定的契約才算互負債務?
而儘管不能主張同時履行抗辯
但雇用人依法還是要給受雇人報酬 是這樣嗎?
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Jacky
at 2018-12-19T11:12
at 2018-12-19T11:12
By Carolina Franco
at 2018-12-22T13:09
at 2018-12-22T13:09
By Faithe
at 2018-12-23T10:17
at 2018-12-23T10:17
By Megan
at 2018-12-25T21:04
at 2018-12-25T21:04
By Charlie
at 2018-12-27T08:13
at 2018-12-27T08:13
By Olivia
at 2018-12-30T05:27
at 2018-12-30T05:27
By Lucy
at 2019-01-03T13:27
at 2019-01-03T13:27
By Robert
at 2019-01-07T17:41
at 2019-01-07T17:41
By Kumar
at 2019-01-11T14:59
at 2019-01-11T14:59
By Brianna
at 2019-01-14T13:59
at 2019-01-14T13:59
By Oliver
at 2019-01-16T13:52
at 2019-01-16T13:52
By Blanche
at 2019-01-19T16:52
at 2019-01-19T16:52
By Charlie
at 2019-01-21T17:25
at 2019-01-21T17:25
By Gilbert
at 2019-01-22T19:46
at 2019-01-22T19:46
By Franklin
at 2019-01-26T07:53
at 2019-01-26T07:53
By Jessica
at 2019-01-27T13:55
at 2019-01-27T13:55
By John
at 2019-01-31T03:47
at 2019-01-31T03:47
By Ivy
at 2019-02-01T22:42
at 2019-02-01T22:42
By Iris
at 2019-02-02T20:45
at 2019-02-02T20:45
By Gilbert
at 2019-02-04T19:43
at 2019-02-04T19:43
Related Posts
追討借款
By Daniel
at 2018-12-17T16:58
at 2018-12-17T16:58
推薦台北婚姻方面律師
By Emily
at 2018-12-17T13:58
at 2018-12-17T13:58
機車撞到違規行人仍要負賠償責任嗎
By Jake
at 2018-12-17T12:34
at 2018-12-17T12:34
強制執行申請的是「行為」時
By Margaret
at 2018-12-17T09:57
at 2018-12-17T09:57
錢包遺失找回來後錢不見了
By Margaret
at 2018-12-17T01:26
at 2018-12-17T01:26