這樣能否主張刑法19條第1.2項? - 法律
By David
at 2011-11-02T16:58
at 2011-11-02T16:58
Table of Contents
設甲獨自在家喝酒,決定閉門不與人來往
但在喝醉之際,債權人乙不告而入,與甲發生爭執,被甲殺死
甲會因為原因自由行為而受罰嗎?
而甲可以依刑法第19條第1項及第2項主張不能辨識或辨識減弱嗎?
--
posted from android bbs reader on my HTC Desire
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.bbs.reader
--
但在喝醉之際,債權人乙不告而入,與甲發生爭執,被甲殺死
甲會因為原因自由行為而受罰嗎?
而甲可以依刑法第19條第1項及第2項主張不能辨識或辨識減弱嗎?
--
posted from android bbs reader on my HTC Desire
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.bbs.reader
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Eartha
at 2011-11-05T14:45
at 2011-11-05T14:45
By Frederic
at 2011-11-10T04:32
at 2011-11-10T04:32
By Xanthe
at 2011-11-11T12:13
at 2011-11-11T12:13
Related Posts
此情況是否視為蓄意脫產的行為呢?
By Hazel
at 2011-11-02T14:30
at 2011-11-02T14:30
Manfred Nowak教授訪臺系列演講
By Hamiltion
at 2011-11-02T11:52
at 2011-11-02T11:52
這樣能構成公然侮辱嘛
By Doris
at 2011-11-02T09:47
at 2011-11-02T09:47
欠稅管收問題
By Tom
at 2011-11-02T09:34
at 2011-11-02T09:34
戶籍法的規費問題
By Dinah
at 2011-11-02T03:54
at 2011-11-02T03:54