關於侵權行為的問題: - 法律
By Hamiltion
at 2011-05-10T18:25
at 2011-05-10T18:25
Table of Contents
民法184~191之3是請求權基礎,因為具備了成立要件和法律效果;
192~195卻通常被認為是效果規定而已,並非完全性法條。
我想請問的是:
192的不法侵害他人致死
193的不法侵害他人之身體健康
194的不法侵害他人致死.....
195的不法侵害他人之身體、健康、名譽、自由...(請原諒我偷懶)
192-195條文中提及的負損害賠償責任是法律效果我知道,但是為什麼
以上打的這些不能算是成立要件?而把192和195也變成請求權基礎
是因為和184重複到所以不算嗎...抱歉我剛接觸所以不是很了解。
(還是192-195仍然是請求權基礎,只是我理解錯誤?怎覺得有點混亂)
--
192~195卻通常被認為是效果規定而已,並非完全性法條。
我想請問的是:
192的不法侵害他人致死
193的不法侵害他人之身體健康
194的不法侵害他人致死.....
195的不法侵害他人之身體、健康、名譽、自由...(請原諒我偷懶)
192-195條文中提及的負損害賠償責任是法律效果我知道,但是為什麼
以上打的這些不能算是成立要件?而把192和195也變成請求權基礎
是因為和184重複到所以不算嗎...抱歉我剛接觸所以不是很了解。
(還是192-195仍然是請求權基礎,只是我理解錯誤?怎覺得有點混亂)
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Noah
at 2011-05-11T06:34
at 2011-05-11T06:34
By Zanna
at 2011-05-14T13:58
at 2011-05-14T13:58
By Charlie
at 2011-05-15T08:55
at 2011-05-15T08:55
By Mia
at 2011-05-17T20:14
at 2011-05-17T20:14
By Freda
at 2011-05-17T22:31
at 2011-05-17T22:31
By Yedda
at 2011-05-21T12:29
at 2011-05-21T12:29
By Margaret
at 2011-05-22T22:51
at 2011-05-22T22:51
By Lydia
at 2011-05-27T12:39
at 2011-05-27T12:39
By Enid
at 2011-05-28T02:43
at 2011-05-28T02:43
By Andrew
at 2011-05-31T21:21
at 2011-05-31T21:21
By Linda
at 2011-06-01T10:57
at 2011-06-01T10:57
By Enid
at 2011-06-01T14:03
at 2011-06-01T14:03
By Daniel
at 2011-06-05T19:05
at 2011-06-05T19:05
By Agnes
at 2011-06-08T18:50
at 2011-06-08T18:50
Related Posts
網站交易的個案資料原則
By Hedy
at 2011-05-10T14:52
at 2011-05-10T14:52
房屋租賃問題
By Edith
at 2011-05-10T14:30
at 2011-05-10T14:30
車禍肇逃後 不願出面 該怎麼辦?
By Brianna
at 2011-05-10T11:02
at 2011-05-10T11:02
銀行法 主管機關 中央主管機關 分別是誰?
By Quanna
at 2011-05-10T10:35
at 2011-05-10T10:35
關於競標
By Cara
at 2011-05-10T08:10
at 2011-05-10T08:10