關於教唆行為的錯誤問題 - 法律
By Heather
at 2009-11-26T22:04
at 2009-11-26T22:04
Table of Contents
本題來自於林山田老師所著刑法通論9版下冊92頁
A與B兩人同赴山上打獵,在黃昏之時,A從望遠鏡發覺他與B的共同仇人C
正在草叢間走動,即說"快開槍",B聞之,誤以為A所言是獵物,於是開槍將
擊斃C,如何處斷A與B?
B書上沒說,我想應該是客體錯誤來論斷
至於A,書本是這麼說:
因為B欠缺殺人故意,所以A無法成立教唆犯......這我可以理解(欠缺故意主行為)
因為A以為B也想殺C,所以A無法成立間接正犯....這我可以理解(欠缺意思支配)
有問題的是,最後的結論是A論以過失致死罪,以及殺人罪的未遂教唆 兩者想像競合
未遂教唆我大概可以知道 因為被教唆者未萌生犯意
關於過失致死罪是怎麼推斷出來的 有高手可以指點嗎?
我的疑問是
如果A一開始在構成要件的階段是故意
為何到罪責階段便成了過失?
(因為從故意到過失 印象中只有誤想防衛 但此題應該不是 所以我才覺得奇怪)
非常感謝
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Agatha
at 2009-11-29T08:30
at 2009-11-29T08:30
By Skylar Davis
at 2009-12-02T21:51
at 2009-12-02T21:51
By John
at 2009-12-04T11:06
at 2009-12-04T11:06
By Ingrid
at 2009-12-07T20:21
at 2009-12-07T20:21
By Kristin
at 2009-12-10T05:33
at 2009-12-10T05:33
By Eden
at 2009-12-13T12:31
at 2009-12-13T12:31
By Rebecca
at 2009-12-17T19:22
at 2009-12-17T19:22
By Vanessa
at 2009-12-20T20:34
at 2009-12-20T20:34
By Bethany
at 2009-12-23T07:05
at 2009-12-23T07:05
By Zora
at 2009-12-25T07:44
at 2009-12-25T07:44
By Leila
at 2009-12-28T00:10
at 2009-12-28T00:10
By Carolina Franco
at 2009-12-28T13:33
at 2009-12-28T13:33
Related Posts
名詞辨異
By Zanna
at 2009-11-26T21:36
at 2009-11-26T21:36
[請問] 被詐騙沒證據就不能報案嗎?
By Hamiltion
at 2009-11-26T19:14
at 2009-11-26T19:14
名詞辨異
By Puput
at 2009-11-26T17:18
at 2009-11-26T17:18
想請問關於陪審團制度
By Odelette
at 2009-11-26T00:51
at 2009-11-26T00:51
關於多人同時被詐欺的解決方法
By Emily
at 2009-11-26T00:46
at 2009-11-26T00:46