法律上偷拍的定義為何? - 法律
By Belly
at 2010-06-16T00:00
at 2010-06-16T00:00
Table of Contents
今天新聞上說有警察偷拍上空秀女郎的新聞就新聞上看來那名偷拍者只是在公共場所拍攝而已然後女郎們就上前質問並因為要搶相機而扭打我想請問在台灣法律上偷拍的定義為何?只是在公共場所拍攝有構成偷拍的定義嗎?有的話那隨便一張八卦雜誌或網路相簿不就告不完了有人也許會說有肖像權的問題只要沒有公開就沒有這個問題吧?反而是搶相機就很明顯的構成搶劫了如果並沒有構成法律上的偷拍沒有拍到隱私部位連妨害風化或妨害秘密都沾不上邊請
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Puput
at 2010-06-17T05:46
at 2010-06-17T05:46
By Elvira
at 2010-06-20T01:43
at 2010-06-20T01:43
By Doris
at 2010-06-18T17:42
at 2010-06-18T17:42
By Ophelia
at 2010-06-16T01:08
at 2010-06-16T01:08
By Gary
at 2010-06-19T04:53
at 2010-06-19T04:53
Related Posts
不實照片的合成是犯法的嗎
By Rae
at 2010-06-16T00:00
at 2010-06-16T00:00
法條註解有智慧財產權嗎?能在知識+回答時引用嗎?
By Michael
at 2010-06-16T00:00
at 2010-06-16T00:00
案例三:過度追求
By Annie
at 2010-06-16T00:00
at 2010-06-16T00:00
強制險的醫療平常交通事故可以申請理賠嗎?
By Daph Bay
at 2010-06-16T00:00
at 2010-06-16T00:00
噬血真愛的基本問題★
By Belly
at 2010-06-16T00:00
at 2010-06-16T00:00