請問刑法339II及356的差異 - 詐欺
By Kelly
at 2012-08-14T23:52
at 2012-08-14T23:52
Table of Contents
刑法356損害債權罪,必須在債務人受強制執行之際始有適用,
所以,如果債務人在受強制執行之前已有脫產的行為,就無法論356罪,
但是,是否可以說該債務人脫產的行為債權人陷入錯誤,
使債權人長時間不行使債權,債務人因而得到一個債務免除的利益,
而有成立339II詐欺得利罪的可能呢?
謝謝~
--
Tags:
詐欺
All Comments
By Olga
at 2012-08-18T11:36
at 2012-08-18T11:36
By Sandy
at 2012-08-22T18:17
at 2012-08-22T18:17
By Aaliyah
at 2012-08-26T10:09
at 2012-08-26T10:09
By Belly
at 2012-08-29T17:36
at 2012-08-29T17:36
Related Posts
是否有構成詐欺及偽證罪
By Todd Johnson
at 2012-08-10T02:20
at 2012-08-10T02:20
By Puput
at 2012-08-09T12:02
at 2012-08-09T12:02
房東夏日電費超收,我該怎麼辦?
By Kelly
at 2012-08-09T01:26
at 2012-08-09T01:26
這種情況要告侵占還是詐欺?
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2012-07-31T14:50
at 2012-07-31T14:50
網路交易的糾紛
By Rebecca
at 2012-07-26T06:27
at 2012-07-26T06:27