關於未婚生子 孩子撫養相關問題 - 法律

By Ida
at 2010-05-18T20:33
at 2010-05-18T20:33
Table of Contents
: → yuusnow:民1066條:非婚生子女或其生母,對於生父之認領,得否認之 05/18 17:43
: → yuusnow:所以請問你說不能拒絕生父的認領是..........? 05/18 17:44
: → yuusnow:之前那個不能沒有你,就是因為生父無法替女兒提否認之訴 05/18 17:45
: → yuusnow:又不能認領女兒才會鬧這麼大 05/18 17:47
: 推 ulycess:樓上正解,即使有明確證據是生父,生母亦得否認認領 05/18 17:54
: → ulycess:不能沒有你的故事是爸爸和女朋友生下小孩後,女朋友不告而 05/18 17:54
: → ulycess:別,而女朋友有其他段婚姻,所以小孩為婚生子女,法律上的 05/18 17:55
: → ulycess:父親是女朋友的丈夫,爸爸雖然是小孩的親生父親,但爸爸不 05/18 17:57
: → ulycess:能幫小孩提起否定親子關係之訴,才導致社會局介入...... 05/18 18:00
: → ulycess:修正一下,應該是不能引用1067條,生父不能幫小孩提起認領 05/18 18:06
: → ulycess:之訴,那時小孩還小進行訴訟須法定代理人,小孩的法定代理 05/18 18:07
: → ulycess:人一個失蹤,一個不知道是誰...... 05/18 18:08
: → ulycess:所以男朋友有養過小孩,視為認領,但生母能否認之,男朋友 05/18 18:13
: → ulycess:不能上法院提出認領之訴,所以媽媽想要小孩,爸爸是不可搶 05/18 18:14
: → ulycess:走的,d大說法有誤...... 05/18 18:15
: → greatshiau:我記得不能否認真正生父的認領... 05/18 18:29
: → ulycess:1066條規定的生父應該沒有分真正生父和假的生父吧...... 05/18 18:47
剛翻了一下書(三人合著,七版)
1066相關的流程應是:
生父認領===>生母或子女否認(形成權,無需舉證)===>生父提確認父子女關係存在之訴
1066係為平衡認領行為就一般而言,僅為不要式行為兼單獨行為,過於容易成立而設
但並無對抗真正血緣生父認領之功能
而「不能沒有你」的問題我記得是1063不是1067
亦即舊法下僅夫妻雙方有婚生否認權,子女本人及生父無
d大說法應無誤
--
例え星の列びが
変わるほど、時を隔てても
必ず、君に逢いに行くよ......
~久遠の絆より
--
: → yuusnow:所以請問你說不能拒絕生父的認領是..........? 05/18 17:44
: → yuusnow:之前那個不能沒有你,就是因為生父無法替女兒提否認之訴 05/18 17:45
: → yuusnow:又不能認領女兒才會鬧這麼大 05/18 17:47
: 推 ulycess:樓上正解,即使有明確證據是生父,生母亦得否認認領 05/18 17:54
: → ulycess:不能沒有你的故事是爸爸和女朋友生下小孩後,女朋友不告而 05/18 17:54
: → ulycess:別,而女朋友有其他段婚姻,所以小孩為婚生子女,法律上的 05/18 17:55
: → ulycess:父親是女朋友的丈夫,爸爸雖然是小孩的親生父親,但爸爸不 05/18 17:57
: → ulycess:能幫小孩提起否定親子關係之訴,才導致社會局介入...... 05/18 18:00
: → ulycess:修正一下,應該是不能引用1067條,生父不能幫小孩提起認領 05/18 18:06
: → ulycess:之訴,那時小孩還小進行訴訟須法定代理人,小孩的法定代理 05/18 18:07
: → ulycess:人一個失蹤,一個不知道是誰...... 05/18 18:08
: → ulycess:所以男朋友有養過小孩,視為認領,但生母能否認之,男朋友 05/18 18:13
: → ulycess:不能上法院提出認領之訴,所以媽媽想要小孩,爸爸是不可搶 05/18 18:14
: → ulycess:走的,d大說法有誤...... 05/18 18:15
: → greatshiau:我記得不能否認真正生父的認領... 05/18 18:29
: → ulycess:1066條規定的生父應該沒有分真正生父和假的生父吧...... 05/18 18:47
剛翻了一下書(三人合著,七版)
1066相關的流程應是:
生父認領===>生母或子女否認(形成權,無需舉證)===>生父提確認父子女關係存在之訴
1066係為平衡認領行為就一般而言,僅為不要式行為兼單獨行為,過於容易成立而設
但並無對抗真正血緣生父認領之功能
而「不能沒有你」的問題我記得是1063不是1067
亦即舊法下僅夫妻雙方有婚生否認權,子女本人及生父無
d大說法應無誤
--
例え星の列びが
変わるほど、時を隔てても
必ず、君に逢いに行くよ......
~久遠の絆より
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments

By Edith
at 2010-05-21T13:04
at 2010-05-21T13:04

By Caroline
at 2010-05-24T14:34
at 2010-05-24T14:34

By Robert
at 2010-05-28T03:43
at 2010-05-28T03:43

By Candice
at 2010-05-28T17:11
at 2010-05-28T17:11

By Edwina
at 2010-05-29T11:52
at 2010-05-29T11:52

By Hazel
at 2010-06-01T10:15
at 2010-06-01T10:15

By Yuri
at 2010-06-04T13:43
at 2010-06-04T13:43

By Isla
at 2010-06-07T21:44
at 2010-06-07T21:44

By Isla
at 2010-06-08T17:24
at 2010-06-08T17:24

By Liam
at 2010-06-09T00:03
at 2010-06-09T00:03

By Faithe
at 2010-06-10T11:19
at 2010-06-10T11:19

By Delia
at 2010-06-12T02:27
at 2010-06-12T02:27

By Agatha
at 2010-06-14T16:53
at 2010-06-14T16:53

By Victoria
at 2010-06-18T04:20
at 2010-06-18T04:20

By Leila
at 2010-06-20T12:06
at 2010-06-20T12:06

By Cara
at 2010-06-25T11:07
at 2010-06-25T11:07

By Hardy
at 2010-06-28T17:53
at 2010-06-28T17:53

By Regina
at 2010-06-29T12:21
at 2010-06-29T12:21

By Oscar
at 2010-07-03T09:57
at 2010-07-03T09:57

By Jake
at 2010-07-07T17:32
at 2010-07-07T17:32

By Daniel
at 2010-07-12T06:57
at 2010-07-12T06:57

By Noah
at 2010-07-12T19:18
at 2010-07-12T19:18

By Carolina Franco
at 2010-07-15T04:58
at 2010-07-15T04:58

By Frederic
at 2010-07-16T01:00
at 2010-07-16T01:00

By Eartha
at 2010-07-19T08:36
at 2010-07-19T08:36

By Carol
at 2010-07-19T10:34
at 2010-07-19T10:34

By Michael
at 2010-07-21T23:07
at 2010-07-21T23:07

By Skylar Davis
at 2010-07-26T21:43
at 2010-07-26T21:43

By Daph Bay
at 2010-07-30T10:32
at 2010-07-30T10:32

By Lauren
at 2010-08-03T12:22
at 2010-08-03T12:22

By Tom
at 2010-08-05T08:32
at 2010-08-05T08:32

By Donna
at 2010-08-06T05:03
at 2010-08-06T05:03

By Catherine
at 2010-08-07T14:16
at 2010-08-07T14:16

By Elizabeth
at 2010-08-08T17:44
at 2010-08-08T17:44

By Megan
at 2010-08-11T17:19
at 2010-08-11T17:19

By Kyle
at 2010-08-13T14:53
at 2010-08-13T14:53

By Rebecca
at 2010-08-14T13:54
at 2010-08-14T13:54

By Tracy
at 2010-08-17T19:09
at 2010-08-17T19:09

By Lucy
at 2010-08-20T14:44
at 2010-08-20T14:44

By Hamiltion
at 2010-08-23T22:28
at 2010-08-23T22:28

By Poppy
at 2010-08-24T07:20
at 2010-08-24T07:20

By Jacky
at 2010-08-26T20:52
at 2010-08-26T20:52

By Caitlin
at 2010-08-29T14:19
at 2010-08-29T14:19

By Victoria
at 2010-08-31T00:41
at 2010-08-31T00:41

By Hamiltion
at 2010-08-31T19:52
at 2010-08-31T19:52

By Andy
at 2010-09-02T00:25
at 2010-09-02T00:25

By Zenobia
at 2010-09-04T03:30
at 2010-09-04T03:30

By Hamiltion
at 2010-09-07T08:11
at 2010-09-07T08:11

By Leila
at 2010-09-07T22:19
at 2010-09-07T22:19

By Todd Johnson
at 2010-09-08T06:14
at 2010-09-08T06:14

By Annie
at 2010-09-12T04:19
at 2010-09-12T04:19

By Irma
at 2010-09-17T03:29
at 2010-09-17T03:29

By Olivia
at 2010-09-22T03:04
at 2010-09-22T03:04

By Vanessa
at 2010-09-22T21:13
at 2010-09-22T21:13

By Rosalind
at 2010-09-26T09:40
at 2010-09-26T09:40

By Hamiltion
at 2010-09-30T01:58
at 2010-09-30T01:58

By Edward Lewis
at 2010-10-03T00:16
at 2010-10-03T00:16

By Franklin
at 2010-10-06T00:14
at 2010-10-06T00:14

By Dorothy
at 2010-10-10T00:11
at 2010-10-10T00:11

By Franklin
at 2010-10-13T11:46
at 2010-10-13T11:46

By Madame
at 2010-10-16T11:13
at 2010-10-16T11:13

By Frederica
at 2010-10-20T16:21
at 2010-10-20T16:21

By Xanthe
at 2010-10-22T16:48
at 2010-10-22T16:48

By Oliver
at 2010-10-26T19:55
at 2010-10-26T19:55

By Xanthe
at 2010-10-31T02:23
at 2010-10-31T02:23

By Jessica
at 2010-11-04T12:04
at 2010-11-04T12:04

By Daph Bay
at 2010-11-08T19:11
at 2010-11-08T19:11

By Rae
at 2010-11-10T05:56
at 2010-11-10T05:56

By Margaret
at 2010-11-12T10:35
at 2010-11-12T10:35

By Caroline
at 2010-11-13T01:55
at 2010-11-13T01:55

By Necoo
at 2010-11-14T03:34
at 2010-11-14T03:34

By Zenobia
at 2010-11-14T10:40
at 2010-11-14T10:40

By Jacob
at 2010-11-17T04:25
at 2010-11-17T04:25

By Skylar Davis
at 2010-11-22T01:41
at 2010-11-22T01:41

By Genevieve
at 2010-11-22T13:00
at 2010-11-22T13:00

By Margaret
at 2010-11-23T13:31
at 2010-11-23T13:31

By Jacob
at 2010-11-27T01:18
at 2010-11-27T01:18

By Daniel
at 2010-11-28T20:09
at 2010-11-28T20:09

By Rae
at 2010-12-02T18:21
at 2010-12-02T18:21

By Jacob
at 2010-12-06T01:34
at 2010-12-06T01:34

By Daniel
at 2010-12-10T23:56
at 2010-12-10T23:56
Related Posts
算毀損公物嗎?

By Andy
at 2010-05-18T20:15
at 2010-05-18T20:15
又是一個報稅的問題

By Edward Lewis
at 2010-05-18T19:10
at 2010-05-18T19:10
店家所定"偷竊罰原價10倍"構成恐嚇取財嗎

By Delia
at 2010-05-18T15:57
at 2010-05-18T15:57
店家所定"偷竊罰原價10倍"構成恐嚇取財嗎

By Agatha
at 2010-05-18T14:29
at 2010-05-18T14:29
關於未婚生子 孩子撫養相關問題

By Ida
at 2010-05-18T13:39
at 2010-05-18T13:39