判例制度取消後 - 法律
By Liam
at 2022-12-02T15:55
at 2022-12-02T15:55
Table of Contents
判例制度取消後,理想上,各審級各庭個別法官得各自本於專業和良心
自為判決而不受拘束。但實務上下級審的意見到上級審可能被打槍。所
以根據理性推斷,下級審個別法官應該還是會盡量依循自己上級審的先
前判決意見來審判。例如臺高本院和各分院之判決見解,會對其轄區地
方法院的判決有顯著影響。
乍看下似乎和英美法的判決先例一致,但是英美法並不是每件判決都
會自動形成判決先例。曾看到有些判決書寫明本裁判不作判決先例。
那麼就英美法的規定言,法院決定本判決是否成為判決先例的標準為
何?
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Doris
at 2022-12-04T19:03
at 2022-12-04T19:03
By Linda
at 2022-12-06T22:11
at 2022-12-06T22:11
By Caroline
at 2022-12-09T01:19
at 2022-12-09T01:19
By Hedda
at 2022-12-11T04:27
at 2022-12-11T04:27
By Ina
at 2022-12-13T07:35
at 2022-12-13T07:35
By Anthony
at 2022-12-12T17:41
at 2022-12-12T17:41
By Harry
at 2022-12-14T20:49
at 2022-12-14T20:49
Related Posts
離婚後家中物品分配
By Jake
at 2022-12-02T01:42
at 2022-12-02T01:42
遇到的蝦皮網購問題求解
By Zora
at 2022-12-01T22:59
at 2022-12-01T22:59
離婚財產及孩子監護
By Genevieve
at 2022-11-30T01:50
at 2022-11-30T01:50
老公寓漏水檢查問題
By Ursula
at 2022-11-30T00:51
at 2022-11-30T00:51
抽獎取得正版保養品可否轉售?
By Mason
at 2022-11-29T16:29
at 2022-11-29T16:29