憲法 居住遷徙自由 - 法律
By Yuri
at 2009-02-20T12:20
at 2009-02-20T12:20
Table of Contents
97 初等 一般行政 18題
法院對交保之被告予以限制住居之處分時,是涉及憲法何種基本權利之保障?
A居住自由 B 言論自由 C 遷徙自由 D訴訟權
答案是C
限制住居:
命令犯罪嫌疑人或被告"住居在現在之住所或指定相當之住所命其居住"
,而代替羈押之方法。
大法官釋字452
談住所之選定。大法官指出居住自由包括人民有"選擇住所之自主權"
所以為什麼答案是 C 不是 A ???
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Quintina
at 2009-02-22T18:49
at 2009-02-22T18:49
By Frederic
at 2009-02-25T13:49
at 2009-02-25T13:49
By Thomas
at 2009-02-26T08:41
at 2009-02-26T08:41
By Kyle
at 2009-02-27T13:15
at 2009-02-27T13:15
Related Posts
聲請裁定本票強制執行問題及委託律師費
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2009-02-20T11:58
at 2009-02-20T11:58
RE:蘇建和三人案:高院判決<簡板第三部>
By Dinah
at 2007-07-05T23:08
at 2007-07-05T23:08
民訴二審上訴無理由駁回判決與一審判決
By Ophelia
at 2007-07-04T10:49
at 2007-07-04T10:49
蘇建和三人案:高院判決全文<簡版第二部>
By Vanessa
at 2007-06-30T16:35
at 2007-06-30T16:35
Re: ●蘇建和三人案:高等法院判決書全文
By Gilbert
at 2007-06-30T14:57
at 2007-06-30T14:57