詐欺撤消 - 詐欺
By Kristin
at 2013-08-05T23:24
at 2013-08-05T23:24
Table of Contents
今天甲到乙開的店買車,甲出國不在,
故甲向乙的店員丙買賣車,甲問丙此
車是否為泡水車。丙為不實的表示說此
車為全新沒泡過水。故甲買了車子。但
但甲的朋友丁在一年後向甲借車來開,
才發現此車泡水。結果是甲可以向乙撤
消此交易。但是民法不是規定詐欺的意
思表示可以撤消,但不得對抗善易第三
人。乙的店員丙為詐欺的意思表示,但
乙不知情,為什麼這樣還是得以撤消?
請個位大大幫忙解惑,謝謝。
--
Tags:
詐欺
All Comments
By George
at 2013-08-06T12:39
at 2013-08-06T12:39
By Kumar
at 2013-08-06T18:01
at 2013-08-06T18:01
By Adele
at 2013-08-07T12:43
at 2013-08-07T12:43
By Connor
at 2013-08-09T00:19
at 2013-08-09T00:19
By Todd Johnson
at 2013-08-13T10:49
at 2013-08-13T10:49
Related Posts
新聞的保險詐欺
By Edward Lewis
at 2013-07-17T10:07
at 2013-07-17T10:07
法律專有名詞英文如何撰寫?
By Thomas
at 2013-07-15T18:12
at 2013-07-15T18:12
友人盜刷信用卡的法律處理方式??
By Eartha
at 2013-07-10T00:35
at 2013-07-10T00:35
被詐欺 民事求償金額
By Xanthe
at 2013-07-03T20:46
at 2013-07-03T20:46
過失陳述不實與詐欺
By Barb Cronin
at 2013-06-21T21:07
at 2013-06-21T21:07