限制行為能力人的單獨行為 - 法律
By Gary
at 2016-03-14T22:52
at 2016-03-14T22:52
Table of Contents
民法77條規定
限制行為能力人為意思表示及受意思表示,應得法定代理人之允許。但純
獲法律上利益,或依其年齡及身份、日常生活所必需者,不在此限。
78條規定
限制行為能力人未得法定代理人之允許,所為之單獨行為,無效。
所以原則上需經允許,77但不須經允許直接有效。
未經允許單獨行為無效
1.那符合77條但書的單獨行為可以解釋成本來就不須經允許所以沒有78條的適用嗎?
雖然想來想去都想不到例子
2.請問限制行為能力人單獨行為無效
所以像解除契約、免除債務、拋棄所有權、撤銷等法律行為都無效嗎?
還是說這些就是很好的例子(有一種見解就認為解除權、撤銷權是純獲法律上的利益
感謝版上前輩指教!
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments
By Gilbert
at 2016-03-17T16:46
at 2016-03-17T16:46
By Delia
at 2016-03-22T07:53
at 2016-03-22T07:53
By Bethany
at 2016-03-22T13:09
at 2016-03-22T13:09
By Christine
at 2016-03-22T17:37
at 2016-03-22T17:37
By Zenobia
at 2016-03-24T20:41
at 2016-03-24T20:41
By Donna
at 2016-03-26T15:39
at 2016-03-26T15:39
By Leila
at 2016-03-27T09:42
at 2016-03-27T09:42
By Selena
at 2016-03-31T01:52
at 2016-03-31T01:52
By Kumar
at 2016-04-02T04:35
at 2016-04-02T04:35
By Christine
at 2016-04-03T19:42
at 2016-04-03T19:42
By Quintina
at 2016-04-04T05:48
at 2016-04-04T05:48
By Zenobia
at 2016-04-04T18:26
at 2016-04-04T18:26
By Heather
at 2016-04-04T23:41
at 2016-04-04T23:41
By Mason
at 2016-04-07T06:44
at 2016-04-07T06:44
By Jessica
at 2016-04-10T06:19
at 2016-04-10T06:19
Related Posts
關於性侵的認定
By Faithe
at 2016-03-14T22:32
at 2016-03-14T22:32
民法865和870有矛盾嗎?
By Tom
at 2016-03-14T22:08
at 2016-03-14T22:08
關於勞基法是否適用新法時間點問題
By Kama
at 2016-03-14T18:41
at 2016-03-14T18:41
急,雇主改變薪資模式
By Anonymous
at 2016-03-14T13:28
at 2016-03-14T13:28
天上掉下來的債務
By Jessica
at 2016-03-14T09:58
at 2016-03-14T09:58