Rawl's "justice as fairness" - 法學
By Edward Lewis
at 2006-09-13T10:00
at 2006-09-13T10:00
Table of Contents
你讀錯了
"ethically unjustifiable" 是指「倫理(學)上不可接受的」
※ 引述《sarahgirl (  N )》之銘言:
: 剛好念到一句話
: 但是我怎麼想都想不通
: 我是念護理的,此句話出現在護理倫理的書目中
: "using income inequalities and ability to pat as screening devices for access
: to health care is ethically unjustifiable under this view of justise"
: 所以在Rawls的理論之下,用social economics status 來篩選一個人可使用的醫療資源
: -->是倫理上可以, 但是是不合理的...
: 我的問題是 怎樣才算是合理?
--
Yours truly,
Chiaheng Seetoo
Member, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2006-07
Juris Doctor, Class of 2007
College of Law, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
--
"ethically unjustifiable" 是指「倫理(學)上不可接受的」
※ 引述《sarahgirl (  N )》之銘言:
: 剛好念到一句話
: 但是我怎麼想都想不通
: 我是念護理的,此句話出現在護理倫理的書目中
: "using income inequalities and ability to pat as screening devices for access
: to health care is ethically unjustifiable under this view of justise"
: 所以在Rawls的理論之下,用social economics status 來篩選一個人可使用的醫療資源
: -->是倫理上可以, 但是是不合理的...
: 我的問題是 怎樣才算是合理?
--
Yours truly,
Chiaheng Seetoo
Member, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2006-07
Juris Doctor, Class of 2007
College of Law, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
--
Tags:
法學
All Comments
Related Posts
Rawl's "justice as fairness"
By Olga
at 2006-09-13T09:48
at 2006-09-13T09:48
總統不該做的七件事
By Isabella
at 2006-09-09T19:54
at 2006-09-09T19:54
為什麼國家需要憲法?
By Rosalind
at 2006-09-07T13:24
at 2006-09-07T13:24
為什麼國家需要憲法?
By Agatha
at 2006-09-07T12:05
at 2006-09-07T12:05
為什麼國家需要憲法?
By Annie
at 2006-09-07T01:33
at 2006-09-07T01:33