所以鍾明軒可以對木棉花主張締約上過失 - 法律

By Hazel
at 2020-11-07T23:38
at 2020-11-07T23:38
Table of Contents
鍾明軒vs木棉花
我本來是認為可以
也就是依照民法153 契約成立不以書面為必要
就算契約尚未成立 似乎也有締約上過失可以主張
可是有人說接洽的員工自己去跟鍾明軒談的
不能代表公司 公司沒有授權 所以不能對公司主張
但縱使是員工 在跟對方接洽的時候應該算是公司的代理人吧
所以員工基於業務行為的法律效力歸屬於公司
所以鍾明軒若要主張締約上過失 被告應該還是木棉花公司
我這樣講有錯嗎?
--
Tags:
法律
All Comments

By Andy
at 2020-11-11T23:16
at 2020-11-11T23:16

By Tom
at 2020-11-12T11:20
at 2020-11-12T11:20

By Tracy
at 2020-11-17T09:22
at 2020-11-17T09:22

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2020-11-22T01:03
at 2020-11-22T01:03

By Catherine
at 2020-11-24T21:21
at 2020-11-24T21:21

By Mason
at 2020-11-27T04:32
at 2020-11-27T04:32

By Anthony
at 2020-11-30T20:53
at 2020-11-30T20:53

By Kama
at 2020-12-03T05:02
at 2020-12-03T05:02

By Noah
at 2020-12-03T19:29
at 2020-12-03T19:29

By Donna
at 2020-12-04T03:10
at 2020-12-04T03:10

By Andrew
at 2020-12-06T18:11
at 2020-12-06T18:11

By Joseph
at 2020-12-08T15:05
at 2020-12-08T15:05

By Annie
at 2020-12-08T16:57
at 2020-12-08T16:57

By Frederica
at 2020-12-09T00:05
at 2020-12-09T00:05

By Harry
at 2020-12-11T16:58
at 2020-12-11T16:58

By Ida
at 2020-12-13T14:35
at 2020-12-13T14:35

By Bethany
at 2020-12-16T15:15
at 2020-12-16T15:15

By Hedy
at 2020-12-18T09:46
at 2020-12-18T09:46

By Agnes
at 2020-12-22T15:57
at 2020-12-22T15:57

By Gilbert
at 2020-12-23T08:36
at 2020-12-23T08:36
Related Posts
臉書留言公然侮辱或誹謗

By Quanna
at 2020-11-07T15:15
at 2020-11-07T15:15
土地共有問題

By Odelette
at 2020-11-06T22:03
at 2020-11-06T22:03
討論法律真的用字要精準,否則被吐槽很糗~

By Vanessa
at 2020-11-06T20:50
at 2020-11-06T20:50
法扶律師沒過,又大錢花錢請律師該怎辨!

By Tristan Cohan
at 2020-11-06T17:12
at 2020-11-06T17:12
社維法的"散布謠言"是繼續犯?狀態犯?

By Jacob
at 2020-11-05T23:08
at 2020-11-05T23:08