補償思想下的價格問題 - 法學
By Edward Lewis
at 2010-03-04T21:43
at 2010-03-04T21:43
Table of Contents
說到這個補償~最近有在想[當然還是那麼的不專業...]
刑法的效果除了威嚇之外,還有補償家屬受創的心理,
以及近代的教育導正再入社會的功能
就一位沒啥良心的我來說,一位真正相當泯滅人性的罪犯,我絲毫不在乎第三項功能
舉例而言,一名因為好玩而殺害老婆婆的罪犯,我並不期待他的後悔,我想他有義務
用他的鮮血來威嚇潛在犯罪者,用他的鮮血來安撫激憤的家屬,用鮮血給社會安定感
這是這類罪犯盡力彌補罪過的唯一出路
也許我很主觀,很冷血,如果沒有死刑,前兩項刑法功能肯定不會更好,而第三項也不一定
能落實
--
教育沒有喚醒個人的智慧,反而鼓勵個人去因襲某種模式 因而阻礙了個人
--
Tags:
法學
All Comments
By Quanna
at 2010-03-05T12:33
at 2010-03-05T12:33
By Charlotte
at 2010-03-07T23:15
at 2010-03-07T23:15
By Ida
at 2010-03-11T07:53
at 2010-03-11T07:53
By Yedda
at 2010-03-14T07:57
at 2010-03-14T07:57
By Megan
at 2010-03-18T22:16
at 2010-03-18T22:16
By Sarah
at 2010-03-20T09:16
at 2010-03-20T09:16
By Hedwig
at 2010-03-22T12:53
at 2010-03-22T12:53
By Charlotte
at 2010-03-24T15:09
at 2010-03-24T15:09
By Sarah
at 2010-03-28T08:20
at 2010-03-28T08:20
Related Posts
補償思想下的價格問題
By John
at 2010-03-03T06:05
at 2010-03-03T06:05
法律精神的權力基礎為何??
By Puput
at 2010-03-02T13:42
at 2010-03-02T13:42
法律精神的權力基礎為何??
By Aaliyah
at 2010-03-02T02:41
at 2010-03-02T02:41
法律精神的權力基礎為何??
By Sierra Rose
at 2010-02-28T02:22
at 2010-02-28T02:22
法律精神的權力基礎為何??
By Ina
at 2010-02-28T01:13
at 2010-02-28T01:13